Bedrossian v. California EDD
Hratch Bedrossian appeals from the denial of his petition for writ of administrative mandamus. Appellant sought reversal of the decision of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (Board), affirming the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) who heard evidence and affirmed the determination of the California Employment Development Department (EDD or Department). The Department had determined that appellant was not entitled to certain unemployment insurance benefits, and that due to his false representations and willful material omissions, he was required to repay the benefits with assessed penalties. The Department had further determined appellant should be disqualified for a specified period from receiving future benefits. After an independent review of the administrative record, the trial court denied the petition. Court conclude that appellant has not met his burden to show that the trial court erred, and we affirm the judgment. Respondents have not filed briefs or otherwise appeared in this proceeding.
Comments on Bedrossian v. California EDD