Wild Goose Storage v. RosevilleLand Development Assn.
In this eminent domain proceeding, defendant Roseville Land Development Association (Roseville Land), appeals from a post-judgment order granting the motion of plaintiff Wild Goose Storage, Inc. (Wild Goose), to amend the final judgment in condemnation, nunc pro tunc, to correct a clerical error in the description of a condemned easement over Roseville Lands property. Roseville Land contends that by amending the judgment nunc pro tunc, the court effectively eliminated its potential trespass claim against Wild Goose. Roseville Land further contends the trial court erred in leaving the payment provision in the amended judgment and in refusing to permit Roseville Land to select an independent surveyor, at Wild Gooses expense, to determine the exact location of the pipeline previously installed on Roseville Lands property. Court find no error and affirm the order.
Comments on Wild Goose Storage v. RosevilleLand Development Assn.