legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Estis
Pursuant to a negotiated disposition, appellant Chad Edward Estis pleaded no contest as charged to robbery as a serious felony, conditioned on receiving a sentence of no more than six years if the alleged prior juvenile adjudication were valid and not to exceed three years if the prior were invalid or stricken. Over appellants objection under Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 (Apprendi),[1] the court found the prior juvenile adjudication to be a true and valid strike. It sentenced appellant to a four-year state prison term (double the two-year lower term for robbery). Appellant challenges the use of the prior juvenile adjudication to enhance his sentence because he had no right to a jury trial in that earlier juvenile proceeding. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale