legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re X.R.
V.R., the mother of the child, X.R., has filed a California Rules of Court, rule 8.452 mandate petition. The mother seeks review of an order setting a permanent plan hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. The mother asserts that the juvenile court erred in: assuming jurisdiction over the child; failing to consider family guardianship for the child; and denying her reunification services under section 361.5, subdivision (b)(10). Court deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale