Brown v. Scott
In this medical malpractice suit, plaintiff and appellant Robert Brown appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Stephen Scott, M.D., after a jury found that Scott was not negligent in his diagnosis and treatment of Brown. All of Browns assignments of error are challenges to the correctness of the trial courts evidentiary rulings. However, because Browns briefing violates the California Rules of Court in major respects and, in any event, is inadequate to support any of his claims of error, Court shall affirm in summary fashion.
Comments on Brown v. Scott