legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.B.
Defendant and appellant C.B. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile courts jurisdictional order sustaining a dependency petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a), (b), (e) and (j),[1]and both Mother and defendant and appellant S.A. separately appeal from the disposition order removing the children M.B. and A.H. from Mothers custody and declining to place M.B. with S.A. With modifications to the sustained dependency petition, we affirm. Substantial evidence supported both the juvenile courts jurisdictional findings and disposition order. The juvenile court abused its discretion, however, in amending the petition at the adjudication hearing to conform to proof, as the amendment raised new issues that Mother had no opportunity to defend.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale