P. v. Hill
Appellant Jeffrey Allan Hill appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of first degree felony murder involving the theft of methamphetamine from the victims residence. Appellant contends: (1) the trial court prejudicially erred in instructing the jury with CALCRIM No. 376, Possession of Recently Stolen Property as Evidence of Crime[1]; and (2) the court should have stayed his sentence for possession of the methamphetamine under Penal Code section 654. Court agree with appellants latter argument. Court shall order the judgment modified accordingly and otherwise shall affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Hill