legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Latham
A jury convicted defendant Diana Granier Latham of driving under the influence (Veh. Code, 23152, subd. (a); undesignated section references are to this code; count one) and driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or more ( 23152, subd. (b); count two). In bifurcated proceedings before trial, defendant entered a plea of no contest to driving with a suspended license, a misdemeanor ( 14601.2, subd. (a); count three). After trial, defendant admitted a prior prison term allegation (Pen. Code, 667.5, subd. (b)) and two prior driving under the influence convictions. Sentenced to state prison, defendant appeals. She contends the trial court abused its discretion in imposing sentence by failing to afford her individualized and reasoned consideration. In failing to do so, the trial court, defendant asserts, violated her right to due process. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale