P. v. Dunn
Defendant and appellant Gregory Adam Dunn appeals his jury conviction for manufacturing methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, 11379.6, subd. (a).)[1] He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal under Penal Code section 1118.1, as well as his motion for a new trial pursuant to Penal Code section 1181, subdivision (6). Defendant also argues the trial court erred when it stayed enhancements for a prior conviction and a prior prison term. In addition, defendant complains that the courts minute order of sentencing incorrectly includes a restitution fine of $100 under Penal Code section 1202.4, subdivision (b).
Comments on P. v. Dunn