Martin v. Pacific Specialty Ins.
Appellant Christopher Martin, who had a homeowners insurance policy with respondent Pacific Specialty Insurance Company, brutally assaulted Ricardo Zenon Gutierrez, who recovered an award of $176,667.71 after a bench trial. Respondent declined to defend Martin on the ground that the policy excluded coverage for personal injury that was caused by an intentional act or acts. Martin filed an action for breach of contract and bad faith against respondent, who moved for summary judgment. The motion was granted, judgment for respondent was entered and this appeal ensued. Court affirm.
Comments on Martin v. Pacific Specialty Ins.