legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Montgomery
Gerald Bernard Montgomery was sentenced to four years in state prison following revocation of his probation. On appeal he contends imposition of the upper term based on factual determinations made by the trial judge violated his federal constitutional right to a jury trial under Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. 270 [127 S.Ct. 856, 166 L.Ed.2d 856] (Cunningham) and Blakely v.Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 [124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403] (Blakely). He also contends the trial court abused its discretion by relying on factors that did not support imposition of the upper term. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale