In re Martin G.
A.G. appeals from the jurisdictional findings and dispositional order removing her son Martin, Jr. (Martin) from her custody. She claims the finding of jurisdiction cannot be upheld because the juvenile court failed to obtain her personal consent before entering her plea of nolo contendere. She also claims there is insufficient evidence to support the finding that there is a substantial danger to Martins physical health, safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being if he remained in her custody. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 361, subd. (c)(1).) A.G. also appeals from the judgment terminating her parental rights to her daughter M.G. Her sole claim of error is that the summary denial of her section 388 petition, which occurred two months earlier, was erroneous because she made a prima facie case for relief. While these appeals were pending, the juvenile court held a periodic review hearing in M.G.s case and an 18-month review hearing in Martins case. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the court returned the children to the parents under continued court supervision. The Orange County Social Services Agency (SSA) moved to dismiss the appeals as moot. Court agree the appeals are moot and therefore dismiss.
Comments on In re Martin G.