W.P. v. Superior Court
In dependency proceedings involving his children, W.P. (father) seeks review (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452; Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26, subd. (l)) of orders setting for April 6, 2009, a permanency planning hearing for daughter C.P. and son E.P. Father asserts three claims: (1) a need to correct or clarify findings, (2) judicial misconduct in relying on facts not in evidence, and (3) insufficient evidence for failure-to-participate and reasonable services findings. Court deny his petition on the merits.
Comments on W.P. v. Superior Court