legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Cuillette v. City of Los Angeles
Defendant and appellant the City of Los Angeles (defendant) appeals from a judgment of $1,571,500 in favor of plaintiff and respondent Rory Cuiellette (plaintiff), a Los Angeles Police Department Officer, on his claim of disability discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code section 12900, et seq. (FEHA).[1] On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred when it granted certain of plaintiffs motions in limine because the effect of the grant was to resolve the issue of liability in plaintiffs favor; when it gave a jury instruction and verdict form that failed to require a finding of liability, thus leaving damages as the only issue for the jury; and when it denied a new trial motion. Court hold that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that plaintiff had the burden of proving that he was able to perform the job of a police officer with or without reasonable accommodation, and therefore reverse the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale