P. v. Acosta
David Acosta appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of two counts of robbery and four counts of attempted robbery, with further findings that he used a firearm and committed the offenses for the benefit of a criminal street gang. In a bifurcated bench trial, defendant was found to have sustained a prior juvenile adjudication within the meaning of the Three Strikes law. Defendant contends that use of the juvenile adjudication as a strike violated his rights under the state and federal Constitutions. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Acosta