legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re H.H.
Russell H. and L.S. (the parents) appeal judgments terminating their parental rights to two of their daughters, H.H. and T.H. (the children), and denials of their Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 388 petitions. They contend the court erred by denying their section 388 petitions and by finding the children to be adoptable. They also assert the court erred by not finding the sibling relationship exception to termination of parental rights and adoption applied in the case. Additionally, L.S. asserts the court erred by not finding the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to termination of her parental rights applied in this case, and by designating the children's caretakers as their prospective adoptive parents. Each parent joins in the arguments presented by the other parent. Court affirm the judgments.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale