legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.G.
S.W. (mother) appeals from the orders of the juvenile court denying her request for a continuance, denying a modification petition and terminating parental rights to her daughter, A.G. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 388, 366.26, subd. (c)(1).)[1]Mother contends that (1) she was entitled to a continuance of the six-month status review hearing to allow her to offer additional evidence; and (2) the trial court erred by concluding that the parent-child exception to adoption did not apply. Mother acknowledges that her appeal was not timely filed, but argues that we should apply the doctrine of constructive filing. Court address her argument on the merits, and affirm. The parental rights of the minor's father were terminated in the dependency proceedings, and he is not a party to the appeal.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale