Riverside Sheriffs Assn. v. Trask
Appellant, Riverside Sheriffs Association (the RSA) appeals from the trial courts order denying, in part, the RSAs petition for a traditional writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., 1085), against respondents, the County of Riverside and several county officials acting in their official capacities[1](collectively, the County). In its petition, the RSA claimed that the County violated the meet and confer requirement of section 3505 of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (the MMBA) (Gov. Code, 3505 et seq.),[2]by implementing or adopting eight changes to the wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment of the County law enforcement unit (LEU) employees, whom the RSA represents in collective bargaining with the County pursuant to the MMBA, without first meeting and conferring with the RSA. Court find no error, and affirm the order denying the petition.
Comments on Riverside Sheriffs Assn. v. Trask