legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.K.
J.K. (mother) appeals from an order denying her petition for modification of the juvenile court's prior order denying family reunification services. (Welf. & Inst.Code, 388.)[1] She also appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights to her then 18-month-old son, J.K. (minor). ( 366.26.) Mother contends: (1) the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying her section 388 modification petition; (2) the evidence is insufficient to support the juvenile court's finding that minor is likely to be adopted within a reasonable time; and (3) the juvenile court erroneously found inapplicable the exception to the termination of parental rights that applies where "[t]he parents have maintained regular visitation and contact with the child and the minor would benefit from continuing the relationship." ( 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i).) We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale