P. v. Bolton
John Henry Bolton appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of first degree robbery and found true he personally used a firearm. Bolton argues the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress his prearrest statements because he was not advised of his Miranda[1] rights, the court erroneously admitted evidence of an uncharged robbery, the court erroneously admitted information found on two cellular telephones over his hearsay objections, and the prosecutor committed misconduct. None of his contentions have merit, and Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Bolton