P. v. Davis
Defendant Larry Davis was convicted by a jury of aggravated arson as a result of setting fire to his former girlfriends house for the second time. On appeal, he contends the Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (2008) CALCRIM No. 220, as given to the jury, failed properly to instruct that the evidence must induce a subjective certainty in each of the jurors to satisfy the due process requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Court find no error and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Davis