legal news


Register | Forgot Password

S.M. v. Super. Ct.
By petitions for extraordinary writ, S.M. (Mother) and R.V. (Father) challenge an 18-month permanency review hearing order, made on August 21, 2008, terminating family reunification services and setting a permanency plan hearing for their four children on January 5, 2009. We deny the parents petitions because substantial evidence supports the juvenile courts findings that reasonable services had been provided and that the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) had made reasonable efforts to provide those services. The parents also fail to establish that the court abused its discretion in finding that there were no extraordinary circumstances warranting an extension of reunification services.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale