P. v. Martinez
Abraham Martinez appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of aggravated assault, misdemeanor vandalism, and street terrorism. Martinez argues insufficient evidence supports his conviction for street terrorism, the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on that count, and he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Because we agree insufficient evidence supports his conviction for street terrorism, Court need not address his claim there was instructional error. Court reverse his conviction for street terrorism and remand the matter for resentencing. His ineffective assistance of counsel claim has no merit, and Court affirm the judgment in all other respects.
Comments on P. v. Martinez