legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Richard W.
Wilma H. (appellant), the mother of Richard W. (the minor), appeals from a juvenile court order continuing the minor as a dependent child of the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, .366.21, subd. (e), 395.) Appellant contends: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the courts finding at the six-month review hearing that the Department of Health and Human Services (the Department) provided her with reasonable reunification services; (2) the courts finding that reasonable services were provided prejudiced appellant because her progress in the case plan was hindered due to delay in referral of individual counseling services; (3) the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that the minors return to appellants home would create a substantial risk of detriment to his well-being; and (4) the court improperly denied appellants request for rehearing. Court disagree with each of appellants contentions and shall affirm the order.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale