P. v. Ceja
Efrain Valdez Ceja appeals the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of grand theft of personal property (Pen. Code, 487, subd. (a))[1]and possession of burglar's tools ( 466). The trial court sentenced him to a two-year term in state prison. Ceja asks us to independently review the record of the in camera hearing on his Pitchess motion. He also contends the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction under section 466. While we reject his sufficiency of the evidence claim, Court conditionally reverse the judgment and remand for a new Pitchess hearing in which the proper procedure is followed.
Comments on P. v. Ceja