In re G.B.
C.A., the presumed father of G.B., appeals from two orders generated by the San Francisco Juvenile Court when it terminated G.B.s dependency: (1) a custody order prohibiting him from visiting G.B., and (2) an amended restraining order prohibiting him from contacting either G.B. or the childs mother. C.A. contends that the juvenile court erred in proceeding when it had not been shown that respondent San Francisco Department of Human Services (Department) had complied with the tribe notifications requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq. (ICWA)). He also contends that the record does not contain substantial evidence to support the orders prohibiting him from visiting G.B. Court conclude that these contentions are without merit, and Court affirm.
Comments on In re G.B.