In re J.B.
Arturo B. (Father) and Johanna Q. (Mother) appeal from the order terminating parental rights to their son, J.B. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26.)[1] Father contends all orders in this dependency proceeding are void because he was not properly served with notice of the proceedings. Mother contends the juvenile court erred by failing to apply the parental benefit exception to termination of parental rights. ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) Court find no error and affirm the order.
Comments on In re J.B.