In re E.T.
Thomas T. (father) appeals the juvenile courts order terminating his parental rights to E.T. (minor). According to father, the juvenile court erred when it declined to apply the parental contact exception (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)). Court find no error and affirm.

Comments on In re E.T.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced