In re J.C.
R.C. (the father) appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to his two children. All of his appellate contentions arise out of the denial of a continuance, which the fathers counsel requested on the ground that a social worker he had purportedly subpoenaed had not appeared. That social worker, however, was not the one who had written the report for the hearing; the fathers counsels offer of proof did not indicate that she could give any relevant testimony. In any event, it does not appear that the subpoena was properly served. Accordingly, Court find no error.
Comments on In re J.C.