In re Ariel B.
Ariel Y. (the mother) appeals the termination of her parental rights to Ariel B. (Ariel). She argues the court failed to appoint a guardian ad litem for her, an error that requires reversal. She further contends the court erred by finding the benefit exception of Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) did not apply. Court find that neither of these contentions has merit and affirm the order.
Comments on In re Ariel B.