legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.J.
Following a contested hearing, the juvenile court sustained allegations of lewd acts on a child under the age of 14 accompanied by force or other coercion (Pen. Code, 288, subd. (b)(1) and lewd acts on a child under the age of 14 ( 288, subd. (a)) against L.J. (appellant). The court found that the offenses were felonies and that the maximum period of confinement was eight years. Appellant was granted probation but was detained at juvenile hall pending suitable placement.
Appellant contends the juvenile court erred in finding that he understood the wrongfulness of his conduct because that determination was based on improperly considered statements, and there is insufficient evidence to support the finding. Appellant contends his alleged acts were wrongly prosecuted as criminal conduct under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, and that the proceedings should have been conducted under Welfare and Institutions Code section 601. He also contends that the trial court failed to conduct a competency hearing. And finally, he contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the true finding that appellant violated section 288, subdivisions (a) and (b)(1)). Court disagree and affirm.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale