legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Jordan v. Pollet, Richardson & Patel
Appellants' complaint alleged that they hired Pollet in March 2002 and relied on Pollet to determine whether their insurance policies covered the Holland action and to tender claims to any insurer, but that Pollet failed in those duties. Further, Pollet falsely represented that it was panel counsel to the insurer, so that the insurer would be responsible for all fees. Appellants alleged that they first learned of the malpractice in January 2006, when, in a telephone conversation with the insurer (Carolina Casualty Insurance), they learned that Pollet was not panel counsel and had not submitted its bills to Carolina, and that Carolina would not pay any of Pollet's bills. The judgment is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale