legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.J.
T.J., the mother of 22-month-old S.J., appeals from the juvenile courts order terminating her parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. The sole issue is whether the judgment should be reversed because the juvenile court violated state law interpreting the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.) (ICWA) by failing to inquire about the American Indian ancestry of T.J. and Cornell P., S.J.s alleged father. Because T.J. never affirmatively states that she may have Indian ancestry, any defect in the juvenile courts inquiry was harmless. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale