Goldshteyn v. CHP
Plaintiff Yan Goldshteyn appeals from an order denying a petition for writ of mandate wherein he claimed a breathalyzer was improperly calibrated. The court denied the petition on several grounds: (1) the action was untimely; (2) there was improper service and an improper party; (3) failure to exhaust administrative remedies or lay a foundation for evidence submitted; (4) and lack of an administrative record. Plaintiff challenges each of those grounds. Finding no error, Court affirm.
Comments on Goldshteyn v. CHP