legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Arntz Builders v. City of Berkeley
This litigation arises from the parties construction contract involving the renovation of the Berkeley Central Library. In the underlying litigation, Arntz Builders (Arntz) filed a complaint against the City of Berkeley (City) for breach of contract. A court trial ensued on whether Arntz complied with any applicable Government Code claim requirements. The trial court ruled that Arntz was required to present a Government Code section 910 claim in addition to complying with any contract claims procedures, and that it had failed to present a timely section 910 claim. Arntz appealed. Today, we reverse the trial courts judgment (Arntz Builders v. City of Berkeley (August 25, 2008, A116078) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, ___ [p. 28] (Arntz I)), concluding that the contracts claims procedure exclusively governed the claims to which it applied and that it did not require Arntz to file a statutory claim for disputed amounts exceeding $375,000 (Arntz Builders v. City of Berkeley (August 25, 2008, A116078) pp. 17, 27-28 [nonpub. part of partial pub. opn.].) Accordingly, in this related appeal, Court reverse the trial courts award of attorney fees. The judgment is reversed.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale