Holcomb v. UPP Entertainment Marketing
Appellant Anita Holcomb appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent UPP Entertainment Marketing, Inc. (UPP), under which Holcomb was required to restore funds paid by UPP for rental of a property from a third party during the 2005 Sundance Film Festival (the Festival). Holcomb had acted as UPPs agent in the transaction and when a dispute arose, the owners agent returned UPPs payment to Holcomb. Holcomb contends substantial evidence does not support the judgment, which was rendered under a breach of contract theory. Court conclude the judgment was proper under a theory of money had and received, and affirm.
Comments on Holcomb v. UPP Entertainment Marketing