legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bator
In case Solano County Superior Court No. 178471, following a preliminary hearing at which a motion to suppress evidence was denied, defendant was held to answer on various drug charges. After the filing of a felony information, defendant renewed his motion to suppress via a motion to set aside the information under Penal Code section 995. That motion was denied. Thereafter, defendant was charged in a separate proceeding (Solano County Superior Court No. 185461) with offenses from a different incident. Both cases were resolved in a joint disposition, wherein defendant pled guilty to possessing methamphetamine in case No. 178471 and felony domestic violence in case No. 185461. In each matter, he was placed on three years of probation and ordered to serve 90 days in jail, consecutively, as a condition of probation.
On appeal, he challenges only the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Consequently, below, we set forth only the facts in case No. 178471.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale