In re Dylan E.
Annette S. appeals a judgment declaring her minor son, Dylan E., a dependent of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (c),[1]and the dispositional order removing Dylan from her custody. Annette challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court's jurisdictional and dispositional findings. Court conclude substantial evidence supports the court's jurisdictional findings under section 300, subdivision (c). We further conclude, however, the evidence does not support findings, by clear and convincing evidence, there was or would be a substantial danger to Dylan were he returned home and there were no reasonable means by which he can be protected without removal. Accordingly, Court reverse the dispositional order.
Comments on In re Dylan E.