legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. McPeters
A jury found appellant and defendant Gill McPeters guilty of burglary (Pen. Code,[1] 459, count 1), and petty theft with a prior ( 666, count 2). The trial court found true the allegations that defendant had served three prior prison terms ( 667.5, subd. (b)). The court initially sentenced him to a total term of six years in state prison, which consisted of the upper term of three years on count 1, three years on count 2, stayed under section 654, plus one year on each of the prison priors. However, defense counsel requested defendant be sent to the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC), since he was addicted to narcotics. Both sides stipulated that defendant was an addict, so the court suspended execution of the sentence and committed him to the CRC. On appeal, defendant contends that 1) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his request for an updated supplemental probation report, and 2) the imposition of the upper term violated his right to a jury trial under Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. 270 [127 S.Ct. 856; 166 L.Ed.2d 856] (Cunningham). Court affirm.



Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale