legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Foote v. State of California
Plaintiff Patrick Foote (plaintiff) appeals a summary judgment entered against him on his claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) and violation of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 (section 1983), arising from his alleged unlawful incarceration at the California Institution for Men at Chino (Chino) for 87 days during 2003. Defendants are the State of California; the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (the Department); the Departments Board of Prison Terms (the Board); Marvin Speed III, former Executive Officer of the Board; Jean S. Woodford, a former director of the Department; and Lorie R. DiCarlo (DiCarlo), a former warden at Chino (collectively, defendants). For the reasons stated below, Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale