P. v. Wood
William Wood appeals a judgment after his conviction of identity theft (Pen. Code, 530.5, subd. (a), count one), making a false financial statement (id., 532a, subd. (1), count three) and false personation of another (id., 529, subd. 3, count four). We conclude, among other things, that: 1) the trial court properly admitted Wood's statements to an investigator about his prior acts of identity theft, 2) there was no prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct, 3) the court did not err by denying Wood's motion for new trial based on jury misconduct, 4) it did not abuse its discretion by awarding $44,000 as victim restitution, 5) the award of presentence probation investigation costs must be affirmed, and 6) the abstract of judgment does not conform to the court's oral pronouncement of sentence. The abstract must be corrected. In all other respects, Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Wood