Hawkins v. Hotel
Plaintiff and appellant Thomas Hawkins III (appellant) appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered against him and in favor of defendant and respondent Cecil Hotel (respondent) after the trial court sustained without leave to amend respondents demurrer to appellants second amended complaint. He contends the second amended complaint stated a cause of action for discrimination in violation of the federal Fair Housing Act (FHA) (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), Californias Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, 51 et seq.) and Californias Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, 12955). Court affirm.
Comments on Hawkins v. Hotel