P. v. Gilmore
Defendant Steven Christopher Gilmore appeals his conviction for violation of Penal Code section 261.5, subdivision (d). He contends Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions CALCRIM No. 220, as given to the jury, failed to properly instruct that the evidence must induce a subjective certainty in each of the jurors to satisfy the due process requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Court find no error and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Gilmore