legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.E.
Alleged father Robert D. appeals from an order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to the child D.E. Appellants appointed appellate counsel has since advised this court that, based on his review of the record, no brief would be forthcoming (In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952). By order dated July 16, 2008, we extended time for appellant to personally file a letter brief.
Appellant has filed such a letter brief with this court. In it, he claims the court should have granted a request he made at the section 366.26 hearing for paternity testing and considered his relatives for placement. He also contends the court terminated his rights without proper notice. Having reviewed the record and the relevant law, Court conclude appellants contentions are meritless. Court affirm.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale