Marie E. v. Superior Court
Maria E. (mother) seeks extraordinary writ review of a juvenile court order denying reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing for her two youngest children, Angel M. and Andrew T. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452.)[1] We deny the writ petition. Substantial evidence supports the trial court's finding that mother did not make a reasonable effort to treat the problems that led to the removal and termination of parental rights of an older half sibling in a prior dependency action. ( 361.5, subds. (b)(10) & (11).) The evidence further shows that mother's neglect and parenting problems pose a substantial risk of harm and that reunification services are not in the best interests of the children. ( 361.5, subd. (c).)
Comments on Marie E. v. Superior Court