P. v. Grant
A jury convicted defendant Berle J. Grant of four narcotics and weapons offenses. He contends his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to renew in superior court a suppression motion heard and denied by the magistrate at the preliminary hearing. Court disagree because the record on appeal does not show ineffectiveness of counsel. Renewing the motion would have been pointless because the motion lacked merit.
Comments on P. v. Grant