In re S.M.
Jan M., mother of S.M., appeals from the judgment of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights. She claims the court abused its discretion by refusing to grant her an evidentiary hearing on her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388[1]because she made a prima facie showing of changed circumstances. She also claims the court should have refused to terminate parental rights because she maintained regular contact with S.M. and their relationship outweighs the benefits of adoption. Court find no error and affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re S.M.