legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Greenelsh v. Johnson
Kathryn Greenelsh (Greenelsh) appeals an order of the probate court that a demand for arbitration violated a trust's no contest clause.[1] She contends that her arbitration demand is not a contest because it does not pertain to an instrument, would not nullify or alter any provision of the trust, and is permitted by an express provision of the trust requiring arbitration of disputes. She also contends that the no contest clause does not apply to actions alleging trustee misconduct, and that her proceeding is statutorily exempt from the no contest clause because it alleges improper influence in preparing a trust instrument. (Prob. Code, 21307, subd. (b).) Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale