P. v. Fowler
On appeal, defendant contends (1) the court erred in admitting the recorded interview of one of the victims; (2) the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial because the court applied the wrong legal standard; (3) substantial evidence does not support his conviction under section 288, subdivision (a); and (4) the court erred, under section 654, in sentencing him consecutively on the indecent exposure and rape counts. Finding no error, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Fowler