legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Purdue
Marquis Purdue appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of assault with a semiautomatic firearm (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (b)), with a further finding that he personally used a firearm in the commission of the offense ( 12022.5), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon ( 12021, subd. (a)(1)). In a bifurcated court trial, he was found to have suffered prior convictions under sections 667, subdivision (a), 667.5, subdivision (b), and 1170.12 (the Three Strikes law). Defendant was sentenced to a total term of 33 years in state prison, comprised of an upper term of 9 years on the assault charge, doubled under the Three Strikes law to 18 years; an enhancement of 10 years for firearm use; and an enhancement of 5 years for a prior felony conviction. He contends that the finding of firearm use under section 12022.5 was not supported by the evidence. Court affirm and order the trial court to correct a clerical error in the abstract of judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale